Outsource Magazine Issue 33 - (Page 111)
THE BACK END THE DEAl DoCTor
Paul Morrison, Alsbridge
Paul Morrison is Partner and Head of BPO and Shared Services Practice at Alsbridge.
He has over 16 years’ consulting and sourcing advisory experience and is a former
director of the NOA.
Please take a seat and try to be brave: the Deal Doctor will see you shortly…
Grossly Inflated
“Most of our outsourcing
contracts have indexation
clauses to increase service
charges each year. What is
best practice in this area?”
Indexation, inflation and
COLA (‘Cost of Living
Adjustment’) clauses are
standard fare in all types
outsourcing contracts. The
logic is simple – you contract
for a service, but
each year the
underlying costs
of the service
go up for your
supplier, so they
should be entitled
to pass that cost
on to you. An
inflation clause
in the contract
is a simple way of
automatically incrementing
the charge, to reflect a local
Consumer Price Index or similar
point of reference.
However time may be up
for inflation clauses, and the
main reason is the market. The
past five years have seen a lot
of change: more competition,
more buyer sophistication,
technology change and
pressure on supplier margins.
As a result, any outsourcing deal
a few years ago that allowed
for automatic annual price
increases to their (say) Indian
resourcing costs would be
paying significantly
more than a buyer
going to the market
today. This applies
to labour-intensive
outsourcing such
as BPO, even more
to ITO and above
all to infrastructure
outsourcing where
price falls have been
particularly dramatic.
It remains eminently
reasonable for the risk of future
cost changes to be shared
between client and supplier
(unless the client wants a
risk premium for this baked
in to the price from day one).
But going forward indexation
clauses will need to be more
circumscribed – potentially
capped, and subject to some
sort of verification or benchmark.
Buyers of outsourcing should
not accept a simple automatic
link between the price of their
service and a general economic
index. Recent experience has
shown this is to be too crude.
Til Death Us Do Part?
“We are committed to our
outsourcing supplier, but
how do we stay up to date
with the market without
damaging our relationship?”
A key mistake in this situation
is to treat an outsourcing
relationship as a kind of
marriage (and by implication,
market testing as ‘infidelity’).
Whilst there are
similarities – it’s
a long-term
commitment,
between
consenting
grown-ups,
and you ‘have
to work at it’ to
make it last – the
metaphor breaks
down catastrophically
on many levels. How many
marriages do you know are for a
fixed period of five years? How
many involve the payment of
large sums of money from one
party to the other? And which
marriages have service level
agreements?
Some free-thinking readers
of Outsource may beg to
differ. But the main point is
that outsourcing is a service
and is asymmetrical: it is not a
marriage of equals. The parties
have different roles and different
goals. The client is looking for a
supplier to provide the required
service, to be demonstrably
competitive, and to help find
new value; the supplier is
looking for reasonable margin,
adequate input from the client,
and prospects for new business
in the longer term.
In this context, it is
not just desirable
but important
for buyers of
outsourcing to
retain a certain
promiscuity:
they should
keep their eyes
on the market, test
periodically whether
there are better partners out
there, and in extremis make
the leap (or even move from
monogamy to multisourcing).
All the while your suppliers
should absolutely expect your
respect, management time
and integrity. But find the right
balance between commitment
and challenge, and the chances
are it will make sense to stay
with your incumbent over the
long term.
If you’d like to submit a query for the Deal Doctor, please email Paul at paul.morrison@alsbridge.eu
www.outsourcemagazine.co.uk
●●
●●●●
111
http://www.outsourcemagazine.co.uk
Table of Contents for the Digital Edition of Outsource Magazine Issue 33
Keeping in Touch
Shaji Farooq
Manoeuvre the Maze of Cloud Confusion
E-Invoicing: Where Now and Where Next?
Rick Simmonds
Only Strong Leadership and Governance Can Deliver High Performance
A Healthy Development
Getting to We: Time for a New Negotiating Paradigm
NOA Round-Up
To Outsource or Not to Outsource
Big Data Hits HR
John Willmott
Show Us The Money!
GBS: a Game-Changer for Finance
Neil Pratley
Go East
The Talent Challenge
Head-to-Head
Top Ten
NelsonHall Round-Up
Online Round-Up
The Deal Doctor
Inside Source
The Last Word
Outsource Magazine Issue 33
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/outsource37
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource36
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource35
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_34
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_33
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_32
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_31
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_30
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_29
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_28
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_27
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_26
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/Outsource_issue_25
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/outsource/OM_Issue_24
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/issue21
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/issue23
http://europe.nxtbook.com/emp/outsource/issue22
https://www.nxtbookmedia.com